Evaluating Sources Print

  • academicprofessionalskills, academic, guide, howto, solution, zillionkinghost, hosting, support
  • 0

Judging what to use.

WHAT TO ASK

Who wrote it, and what are their credentials? Where was it published? When? What evidence supports the claims? Who funded it, and does that matter? Has it been peer reviewed?

WHAT PEER REVIEW MEANS

Other specialists assessed it before publication.

WHAT IT DOES NOT MEAN

That it is correct.

WHAT TO PREFER

Primary sources, reporting original research Recent work, where the field moves Established publications

WHAT TO TREAT CAUTIOUSLY

Sources with no author or date Publications that charge for publication without genuine review Material summarising others without citing them Anything with an obvious interest in the conclusion

WHAT TO CHECK

Whether other work supports or contradicts it.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT CONTRADICTION

Report it. Disagreement in the literature is itself a finding.

WHAT NOT TO DO

Select only sources agreeing with your conclusion Cite a source you have not read

THAT LAST POINT

Citing from someone else's citation, without reading it, propagates errors.


Was this answer helpful?
Back

Are you happy with your experience? Leave us a review on Trustpilot.


Trustpilot