Knowledgebase

Granting Appropriate Access Print

  • 0

Deciding what people need.

WHAT THE PRINCIPLE IS

Access limited to what the role requires.

WHY

It limits what a compromised account or a dishonest person can reach.

WHAT TO ESTABLISH FOR EACH ROLE

What systems they need What they need to do in each Whether they need to read, change or administer

WHY THE DISTINCTION

Most people need to read far more than they need to change.

WHAT TO GRANT BY DEFAULT

The minimum.

WHAT TO ADD

What is requested and justified.

WHY REQUESTED RATHER THAN ANTICIPATED

Anticipated access is never removed if it turns out to be unnecessary.

WHAT TO ESTABLISH ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE ACCESS

Who genuinely requires it That it is separate from ordinary accounts

WHY SEPARATE ACCOUNTS

Administrative privilege should not be in use for routine work, where compromise is likeliest.

WHAT TO ESTABLISH

That administrators use ordinary accounts for ordinary work.

WHAT TO LIMIT MOST TIGHTLY

Financial systems and payment authority Customer and personal data System administration Anything that can grant further access

WHY THAT LAST CATEGORY

The ability to grant access is the ability to reach everything eventually.

WHAT TO ESTABLISH ABOUT TEMPORARY ACCESS

That it expires.

WHY

Temporary access granted without an end date is permanent.

WHAT TO USE

Time-limited grants, where the system supports it.

WHAT TO ESTABLISH ABOUT APPROVAL

Who approves access to what.

WHY

Access granted by whoever was asked produces inconsistency.

WHAT TO RECORD

Every grant, who approved it, and why.


Was this answer helpful?
Back

Are you happy with your experience? Leave us a review on Trustpilot.


Trustpilot