Knowledgebase

Saying No to Feature Requests Print

  • 0

Protecting the product.

WHY IT MATTERS

Every accepted feature costs building, maintenance and complexity forever.

WHAT COMPLEXITY COSTS

Slower development More defects Harder onboarding for new users Higher support burden

WHAT TO ESTABLISH ABOUT ANY REQUEST

The underlying problem How many people share it What it is worth

WHAT TO DO WHEN THE ANSWER IS NO

Say so, clearly, with the reason.

WHY CLEARLY

Vague deferral produces repeated asking.

WHAT VAGUE SOUNDS LIKE

It is on the roadmap.

WHAT CLEAR SOUNDS LIKE

We are not planning to build this, because it serves few customers and adds substantial complexity.

WHAT TO OFFER INSTEAD

A different way to achieve the outcome, if one exists.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT REQUESTS FROM LARGE CUSTOMERS

Assess them the same way, then decide commercially.

WHY

Building for one account produces a product that serves nobody well.

WHAT TO DO IF YOU BUILD IT ANYWAY

Recognise it as a commercial decision, and account for the ongoing cost.

WHAT TO RECORD

Requests declined, and why.

WHY

The same request returns, and consistency matters.

WHAT TO WATCH FOR

A declined request recurring from many customers.

WHAT THAT INDICATES

Your assessment may have been wrong.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT EXISTING FEATURES NOBODY USES

Remove them.

WHAT THAT REQUIRES

Notice, and a route for the few who do.


Was this answer helpful?
Back

Are you happy with your experience? Leave us a review on Trustpilot.


Trustpilot