Support Metrics That Mislead Print

  • 0

Numbers that look good and mean little.

WHAT LOOKS GOOD AND MISLEADS

Tickets closed Average handling time First-contact resolution, measured loosely Satisfaction scores with low response rates

WHY TICKETS CLOSED MISLEADS

Closing is not resolving, and it is trivially inflated.

WHY AVERAGE HANDLING TIME MISLEADS

Fast is not good if the problem returns.

WHAT TO PAIR IT WITH

Reopened rate.

WHY FIRST-CONTACT RESOLUTION MISLEADS

It depends entirely on how it is defined, and definitions drift toward flattery.

WHAT TO DEFINE PRECISELY

Whether a follow-up question counts as a second contact.

WHY SATISFACTION SCORES MISLEAD

Extremes respond, and small samples swing wildly.

WHAT AVERAGES HIDE GENERALLY

The slow tail, which is what customers remember.

WHAT TO USE INSTEAD

Percentiles.

WHY

They describe the worst experiences, which drive reputation.

WHAT TO BE SUSPICIOUS OF

Any metric improving while complaints rise.

WHAT THAT INDICATES

The metric is being optimised rather than the outcome.

WHAT TO TRIANGULATE WITH

Reopened tickets Repeat contacts from the same customer Cancellation reasons

WHAT TO NEVER TIE TO INDIVIDUAL PAY

Satisfaction scores.

WHY

It produces rating requests and corrupts the data.

WHAT TO REPORT

A small number of measures, honestly interpreted.


Was this answer helpful?
Back

Are you happy with your experience? Leave us a review on Trustpilot.


Trustpilot