Reviewing Support Processes Print

  • 0

Improving how the work is done.

WHAT TO REVIEW PERIODICALLY

Response commitments against reality Escalation paths, and whether they work Templates, for accuracy Categories, for usefulness Documentation, for currency

WHAT TRIGGERS AN IMMEDIATE REVIEW

A serious complaint A repeated failure A change to the product or team

WHAT QUESTIONS TO ASK

Where do tickets sit longest Where do we escalate most What do staff ask each other most What do customers complain about most

WHY THOSE FOUR

Each points at a specific weakness.

WHAT LONG-SITTING TICKETS INDICATE

A missing skill, tool or authority.

WHAT FREQUENT ESCALATION INDICATES

The same, one level down.

WHAT INTERNAL QUESTIONS INDICATE

A documentation gap.

WHAT TO CHANGE

One thing at a time.

WHY

Several changes at once make the effect unattributable.

WHAT TO MEASURE AFTERWARDS

Whether the specific problem improved.

WHAT TO INVOLVE

The people doing the work.

WHY

They know what wastes time, and they will not adopt what they did not shape.

WHAT TO DOCUMENT

The process, and the reasoning behind it.

WHAT TO RETIRE

Steps nobody can justify.


Was this answer helpful?
Back

Are you happy with your experience? Leave us a review on Trustpilot.


Trustpilot