Knowledgebase

Reviewing Instead of Testing Print

  • softwaretestingqa, software, troubleshooting, security, errors, downtime, guide, howto
  • 0

Finding defects without execution.

WHAT STATIC TECHNIQUES ARE

Examining artefacts without running them.

WHAT CAN BE REVIEWED

Requirements Designs Code Test cases Documentation

WHY REVIEWING REQUIREMENTS MATTERS MOST

A defect in requirements propagates into everything downstream.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN REQUIREMENTS

Ambiguity Contradiction Missing cases Untestable statements Assumptions

WHAT CODE REVIEW FINDS

Logic errors Missing error handling Security weaknesses Maintainability problems

WHAT IT FINDS THAT TESTING DOES NOT

Problems in code paths tests do not reach Issues of clarity and structure

WHAT STATIC ANALYSIS TOOLS FIND

Known defect patterns Unused and unreachable code Type and null problems Security patterns

WHAT THEY COST

False positives requiring configuration.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT THOSE

Tune the rules rather than ignoring output.

WHY

An ignored tool provides nothing.

WHAT TO RUN AUTOMATICALLY

Static analysis, on every change.

WHAT REVIEWS REQUIRE TO BE EFFECTIVE

Small changes Focus Written findings Follow-up that they were addressed


Was this answer helpful?
Back

Are you happy with your experience? Leave us a review on Trustpilot.


Trustpilot